“We’re Going to Host It Internally.”
- Col Cameron
- 1 day ago
- 3 min read

Fair enough.
But the real question isn’t:
“Who in the company could host this?”
It’s:
“What are we trying to achieve—and how do we want our people to feel during and after the event?”
You’ve already invested in the venue, production, catering, travel and the time of hundreds of employees.
The host has an enormous influence over whether the day feels like a bigger company meeting—or a significant event.
If you simply need to pass on information, an internal host may be exactly right. They know the company, understand the content and can keep the agenda moving.
Job done.
But for your key events—the ones that need to stand out—is that enough?
One of my clients has booked me for more than 20 years. They run multiple events throughout the year and often use internal MCs.
But for their most important events, they bring in their external MC.
Why?
Because those events have to feel different, original and creative.
The audience needs to know from the moment they arrive that this isn’t business as usual.
Just as importantly, the leaders need a break.
They don’t want to spend the day watching the clock, preparing introductions or checking whether the next speaker is ready. They want to relax, sit with their people, join the conversations and experience the event alongside them.
Handing over control allows the leadership team to become part of the audience.
It subtly says:
We’re part of this too.
We’re sharing this experience with you.
For a while, the hierarchy begins to disappear.
But simply being external isn’t enough.
A professional external MC needs to bring skills the organisation wouldn’t normally expect its staff to have.
Otherwise, why bring them in?
I come from the world of entertainment, so I bring show elements with me: comedy, music, improvisation and audience interaction.
I’m not there simply to read introductions and announce what’s happening next.
I’m expected to elevate the event.
Where can we involve the audience?
What will lift the energy?
How can we make an important message more engaging?
What will make this moment memorable?
And what do we do when the program suddenly changes?
An internal host may know the company better than I do.
But I should know audiences, timing, entertainment and the dynamics of a live room better than they do.
They lead the organisation.
I lead the room.
That outside position also gives me an advantage.
When I look at a corporate audience, I rarely know where everyone sits on the organisational chart. I’m just as likely to interact with the CFO as I am with the receptionist, a new graduate or someone who’s worked there for 30 years.
To me, they’re all part of the room.
That helps make the experience inclusive, unpredictable and shared.
An external keynote speaker can create a similar shift.
When the leadership team sits alongside employees to hear an outside perspective, it sends a powerful message:
We don’t believe we have all the answers.
We’ve invested in bringing this person here.
We’re open to learning too.
So yes, hosting internally can be a great idea.
But before making the decision, ask:
Are we choosing this person because they’re the best host for the event—or because they happen to work here?
Do you need someone to introduce the next speaker?
Or do you need someone to create energy, connect the program, involve the audience and turn the day into an experience?
And do you want your leaders running the event?
Or connecting with their people?
Hosting internally might save one line in the budget.
But after everything else you’ve invested, perhaps the bigger question is:
What will it cost if your most important event feels like just another meeting?



Comments